The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
In Today’s Education Landscape, What Is a School?
English Summary
The article critiques proposed Treasury regulations for the federal scholarship tax credit (FSTC), arguing that the proposed definition of "school" is overly restrictive and flawed. By relying on the Coverdell definition, Treasury risks excluding thousands of eligible students, particularly homeschoolers, due to variations in state-level definitions of educational institutions. The author argues that the regulation should interpret "school" broadly, recognizing that the law's intent was to support education itself, not specific physical buildings. Policy advocates must challenge this regulatory definition to ensure the FSTC maximizes educational freedom and remains consistent with Congress's broad intent.
中文摘要
本文批判了財政部針對聯邦獎學金稅收抵免（FSTC）所擬定的法規，認為其對「學校」的定義過於限制且有缺陷。由於過度依賴Coverdell的定義，財政部有風險排除數千名符合資格的學生，特別是居家自學（homeschoolers）學生，因為各州對教育機構的定義存在差異。作者主張，該法規應廣泛解釋「學校」一詞，認識到法律的本意是支持教育本身，而非特定的實體建築物。政策倡議者必須挑戰此類監管定義，以確保FSTC能夠最大化教育自由，並與國會的廣泛立法意圖保持一致。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
4.
The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.
-
5.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.