The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
“Sorry to the Cato Institute…”
English Summary
The Cato Institute critiques the growing trend of policy advocacy that relies on racial or ethnic 'feelings' rather than empirical evidence or rational principles. The article argues that true governance, rooted in classical liberalism, must prioritize individual liberty and data-driven analysis, citing James Madison's defense of diversity as foundational to a free society. It warns that allowing emotional whims to dictate policy undermines the constitutional goal of protecting diverse interests from group-level hostility. Consequently, the Institute advocates that policy strategy must reject collectivist racial essentialism in favor of rational, fact-based debates focused on individual rights and free markets.
中文摘要
卡托學會（Cato Institute）批評了當前政策倡議中，過度依賴種族或族裔「情感」而非實證證據或理性原則的趨勢。本文主張，真正的治理體系必須植根於古典自由主義，並將個人自由和數據驅動的分析置於首位，並援引詹姆斯·麥迪遜（James Madison）關於多元性對自由社會基礎性的論述。該學會警告稱，允許情緒化的任性來決定政策，將會破壞憲法保障各類利益免受群體層面敵意的根本目標。因此，該學會主張，政策策略必須拒絕集體主義的種族本質主義，轉而支持以個人權利和自由市場為焦點的理性、基於事實的辯論。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
4.
The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.
-
5.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.