The Western Pacific remains a highly active theater defined by sustained U.S.-led military exercises and escalating great power competition. Key evidence includes continuous joint operations, such as RIMPAC 2026 in Hawaii and the deployment of CSGs into the South China Sea, juxtaposed with increased naval activity from both China (PLAN task groups) and Russia near Japan's critical straits. These movements underscore a strategic push by non-allied powers to assert presence and challenge regional norms. Policy implications dictate that allied nations must maintain robust multilateral cooperation and interoperability to safeguard freedom of navigation and manage escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific.
China’s $735 B Trade Surplus + How Beijing Masks Its Holdings + The G 7 Debates Global Imbalances
English Summary
This CFR analysis highlights the record-breaking $735 billion trade surplus China maintained in 2025, driven by its role as a global manufacturer and the U.S.'s consumer demand. The authors argue that despite years of pressure, Beijing has successfully masked its holdings through strategic financial maneuvers. The significant surplus, exceeding even Germany's historical peak, is viewed as a key driver of global imbalances. This situation is being actively debated by the G7, particularly under the focus of French President Macron, and represents a substantial risk to the global economy. The analysis underscores the need for continued scrutiny of these imbalances and their potential impact on trade and investment flows.
中文摘要
本CFR分析突顯了2025年中國創下歷史紀錄的7350億美元貿易順差，這主要歸功於其作為全球製造中心的地位以及美國的消費需求。作者認為，儘管多年來一直受到壓力，北京仍透過戰略性的金融操作成功地掩蓋了其資產持有情況。這個巨大的順差，甚至超過了德國歷史上的高峰，被視為全球失衡的重要推動力。目前，這一情況正受到G7的積極討論，特別是在法國總統馬克龍的關注下，並對全球經濟構成重大風險。分析強調了持續審查這些失衡及其對貿易和投資流動的潛在影響的必要性。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
-
3.
The article argues that current market borrowing costs are rising independently of the Federal Reserve's policy stance, challenging the assumption that the Fed controls all rates. Evidence shows significant increases in key rates—such as 2-year Treasuries and mortgages—even while the effective federal funds rate remains steady. This divergence occurs because market rates reflect complex factors like inflation expectations, credit risk, and geopolitical volatility, which are outside the central bank's direct control. Policymakers should therefore recognize that sustainable rate moderation requires credible disinflation and disciplined government budgets, rather than relying solely on Fed intervention.
-
4.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.
-
5.
The article argues that bond market behavior is not driven by an 'addiction' to tariff revenue but rather by the government’s overall fiscal health, growth prospects, and debt servicing capacity. Key evidence shows that customs duties generate a fraction of total federal receipts compared to core tax streams, meaning tariffs are too small to fundamentally alter the nation's fiscal trajectory. Furthermore, market reactions were dictated by the aggregate economic damage caused by large tariffs (inflation/growth concerns), not merely the revenue generated. Policymakers should recognize that the real concern for bond investors remains persistent budget deficits and high interest costs, issues that require comprehensive structural reform rather than reliance on tariff income.