The Western Pacific remains a highly active theater defined by sustained U.S.-led military exercises and escalating great power competition. Key evidence includes continuous joint operations, such as RIMPAC 2026 in Hawaii and the deployment of CSGs into the South China Sea, juxtaposed with increased naval activity from both China (PLAN task groups) and Russia near Japan's critical straits. These movements underscore a strategic push by non-allied powers to assert presence and challenge regional norms. Policy implications dictate that allied nations must maintain robust multilateral cooperation and interoperability to safeguard freedom of navigation and manage escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific.
How China Turned Its Platform Economy Into an AI Deployment Machine
English Summary
China’s platform economy is rapidly deploying AI through the widespread adoption of open-source agent harnesses like OpenClaw, fueled by intense competition, regulatory pressure, and a tech-savvy public. The ‘OpenClaw craze’ saw explosive growth in China, with users rapidly installing and utilizing AI agents for diverse tasks, creating a significant deployment gap compared to the U.S. This acceleration is driven by China’s ‘AI+’ initiative and supportive local government policies. The U.S. needs to address public trust in AI and reassert itself in global standards to compete effectively, particularly given the fragmented nature of its tech ecosystem.
中文摘要
中國的平台經濟正在通過廣泛採用如OpenClaw等開源代理架構，以人工智能（AI）快速部署。這受到激烈的市場競爭、監管壓力以及一位技術精明的公眾推動。所謂的‘OpenClaw風潮’在中國引發了爆炸式增長，用戶迅速安裝並利用AI代理處理多種任務，與美國相比，部署差距顯著。這種加速受到中國‘AI+’倡議以及支持性的地方政府政策的推動。美國需要解決公眾對人工智能的信任問題，並重新確立在全球標準中地位，以有效競爭，尤其考慮到其技術生態系統的碎片化。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
-
3.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.
-
4.
The author argues that the new 'Section 301' tariffs, ostensibly targeting forced labor, are not a genuine human rights measure but rather an attempt to re-establish a broad, punitive tariff wall. Key evidence supporting this claim includes the rushed nature of the investigation (98 pages for 60 economies), the lack of specific economic harm analysis, and the imposition of disproportionately high tariffs that far exceed any proportional response. Strategically, the use of human rights language to generate revenue sets a dangerous precedent, potentially allowing future administrations to bypass legislative processes and misuse trade law. The article concludes by urging Congress to reform these laws before they cause further damage to international trade frameworks.
-
5.U.S. Navy Orders Low-cost Missiles to Expand Fleet, Allied Long-Range Maritime Strike Capabilities (USNI)
The U.S. Navy is prioritizing the procurement of low-cost, long-range cruise missiles through programs like CHAOS and CAMS to significantly expand strike capabilities for both its own fleet and allied partners. This strategic shift provides affordable precision munitions capable of striking targets up to 1,000 nautical miles, addressing critical stockpiles depleted by recent conflicts. By developing these systems, the U.S. aims to overcome procurement delays faced by allies (such as Japan and Taiwan) who rely on older missile designs. Ultimately, this initiative strengthens allied deterrence and bolsters long-range maritime strike capabilities necessary for potential conflict with China.