ThinkTankWeekly

‘Parliaments in dialogue’: Bringing Westminster and Brussels closer together to defend Europe

Chatham House | 2026-04-27 | europe

Topics: Europe

Visit original source

ThinkTankWeekly provides a curated entry and summary only. Full text and PDF remain on the publisher's website.

English Summary

Chatham House is launching a dialogue series focused on enhancing security and defense cooperation between the UK and the EU. The core argument is that aligning strategic ambitions and deepening practical collaboration between Westminster and Brussels is crucial for defending Europe amidst global uncertainty. The initiative brings together parliamentary members and defense experts to identify mechanisms for institutional cooperation. This suggests a strategic policy shift toward formalizing legislative-level partnerships to strengthen the collective security architecture of the continent.

中文摘要

查塔姆學會(Chatham House)將啟動一場對話系列,旨在加強英國與歐盟之間的安全及國防合作。其核心論點是,為應對全球不確定性,協調英國(威斯敏斯特)與歐盟(布魯塞爾)的戰略目標,並深化實務層面的協作,對於維護歐洲安全至關重要。此項倡議匯集了議會成員和國防專家,以找出建立制度化合作的機制。這顯示出一個戰略性的政策轉變,即朝向正式建立立法層級的夥伴關係,從而強化歐洲大陸的集體安全架構。

Related Entries

  1. 1.
    2026-07-24 | middle_east | 2026-W30 | Topics: AI, China, Europe, Middle East, NATO, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  2. 2.
    2026-07-24 | china_indopacific | 2026-W30 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  3. 3.
    2026-07-24 | economy | 2026-W30 | Topics: Europe, Indo-Pacific, Trade, United States

    The publication argues that Congress must reclaim tariff authority from the executive branch, which has historically imposed unilateral, legally dubious tariffs without proper oversight. The proposed Congressional Trade Powers Reform Act (CTPRA) aims to mandate affirmative Congressional approval for all trade restrictions and institute a 180-day sunset clause, forcing the administration to continually prove the necessity of existing duties. This reform would shift the burden of proof back to the White House, stabilizing international commerce by preventing ad hoc tariff imposition. Policy strategists should view this legislative effort as a critical step toward restoring constitutional balance in US trade law.

    Read at CATO

  4. 4.
    2026-07-23 | economy | 2026-W30 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Trade, United States

    The analysis argues that China's strategic challenge has shifted from a systemic rivalry to one of internal economic decay, driven by the collapse of domestic demand following the property sector bubble burst. This weakness forces Beijing to rely heavily on exports for growth, which depresses global prices and weakens its overall economic standing relative to the U.S. Policymakers should view this as a definitive opportunity: aggressively investing in Western industrial resilience and implementing credible trade defenses will further erode China's strategic position. By doing so, the West can mitigate future security threats while deterring Beijing’s ability to weaponize supply chain vulnerabilities.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  5. 5.
    2026-07-22 | middle_east | 2026-W30 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that standalone, transactional diplomatic bargains—such as the recent US-Iran cease-fire—are inherently doomed to fail because they postpone resolution rather than addressing the root causes of conflict. The failure stems from a global shift away from structured multilateralism toward narrow, opportunistic deals, which allows warring parties to merely pause fighting while preparing for the next escalation. This trend increases regional instability by leaving fundamental disputes unresolved (e.g., the core security dilemma between Iran and the West). Policymakers must therefore recognize that relying on personal access or quick fixes is insufficient; sustained conflict resolution requires robust institutional frameworks and comprehensive political compromise.

    Read at Foreign Affairs