The Western Pacific remains a highly active theater defined by sustained U.S.-led military exercises and escalating great power competition. Key evidence includes continuous joint operations, such as RIMPAC 2026 in Hawaii and the deployment of CSGs into the South China Sea, juxtaposed with increased naval activity from both China (PLAN task groups) and Russia near Japan's critical straits. These movements underscore a strategic push by non-allied powers to assert presence and challenge regional norms. Policy implications dictate that allied nations must maintain robust multilateral cooperation and interoperability to safeguard freedom of navigation and manage escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific.
Who will be the next UN Secretary-General? Rafael Mariano Grossi and Rebeca Grynspan each present their vision
English Summary
The UN is facing profound institutional pressure due to great-power divisions, funding crises, and questions regarding the selective application of international rules. Candidates Rafael Grossi and Rebeca Grynspan are presenting distinct visions for the next Secretary-General, drawing on their expertise in specialized areas. Grossi emphasizes navigating complex technical diplomacy, such as nuclear non-proliferation, while Grynspan focuses on equitable development and the interests of vulnerable economies. The core challenge for the incoming leader is to restore confidence in the rules-based multilateral framework and implement deep structural reforms to ensure the UN's continued relevance and funding stability.
中文摘要
聯合國目前正因大國分裂、資金危機，以及國際規則選擇性執行的問題，面臨深層的制度壓力。候選人拉斐爾·格羅西（Rafael Grossi）和蕾貝卡·格林斯潘（Rebeca Grynspan）針對下一任秘書長提出了各自的願景，並運用了其專業領域的知識。格羅西強調應處理複雜的技術外交議題，例如核不擴散；而格林斯潘則著重於公平發展和弱勢經濟體的利益。新任領導人核心的挑戰在於，必須恢復對基於規則的多元體系的信心，並實施深層的結構性改革，以確保聯合國持續的相關性和資金穩定性。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
-
3.
The article argues that current market borrowing costs are rising independently of the Federal Reserve's policy stance, challenging the assumption that the Fed controls all rates. Evidence shows significant increases in key rates—such as 2-year Treasuries and mortgages—even while the effective federal funds rate remains steady. This divergence occurs because market rates reflect complex factors like inflation expectations, credit risk, and geopolitical volatility, which are outside the central bank's direct control. Policymakers should therefore recognize that sustainable rate moderation requires credible disinflation and disciplined government budgets, rather than relying solely on Fed intervention.
-
4.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.
-
5.
The article argues that bond market behavior is not driven by an 'addiction' to tariff revenue but rather by the government’s overall fiscal health, growth prospects, and debt servicing capacity. Key evidence shows that customs duties generate a fraction of total federal receipts compared to core tax streams, meaning tariffs are too small to fundamentally alter the nation's fiscal trajectory. Furthermore, market reactions were dictated by the aggregate economic damage caused by large tariffs (inflation/growth concerns), not merely the revenue generated. Policymakers should recognize that the real concern for bond investors remains persistent budget deficits and high interest costs, issues that require comprehensive structural reform rather than reliance on tariff income.