The White House (via OMB) strongly protests Congressional efforts within the FY 2027 NDAA to prohibit the purchase of warships from foreign shipyards. The Administration argues that these restrictions undermine national security by limiting flexibility and hindering its strategy of leveraging allied yards, such as in the 'Finland model,' to drive investment into U.S. shipbuilding capacity. This signals a significant policy shift toward integrating international partners into advanced naval construction, suggesting the Pentagon is prepared to bypass traditional domestic build requirements for future combat vessels.
Iran and the new Persian Gulf equilibrium
English Summary
The article argues that the 2026 US-Iran war has permanently reshaped Persian Gulf geopolitics by breaking the psychological barrier against closing the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran will now integrate as a core deterrence tool replacing the weakened Axis of Resistance. Iran's forward-defense strategy through proxy groups like Hezbollah and Hamas failed to deter US and Israeli strikes on Iranian soil, prompting Tehran to shift its strategic focus to Hormuz closure and Gulf-state targeting as primary leverage. The Houthi capacity to simultaneously disrupt the Bab al-Mandab compounds this threat to global shipping. Iran will prioritize rebuilding missile and drone capabilities over nuclear infrastructure to keep the Strait closure option credible. For policymakers, this means the Gulf's pre-February 2026 security architecture is obsolete: GCC states face a persistent coercion threat, energy supply-chain diversification is now urgent, and any future diplomatic framework must account for Iran's demonstrated willingness to weaponize maritime chokepoints.
中文摘要
本文主張，2026年美伊戰爭已永久重塑波斯灣地緣政治格局，打破了封鎖荷莫茲海峽的心理障礙。伊朗將把封鎖海峽納入核心嚇阻工具，取代已遭削弱的「抵抗軸心」。伊朗過去透過真主黨、哈馬斯等代理武裝組織推行前沿防禦戰略，但未能阻止美國與以色列對伊朗本土的打擊，促使德黑蘭將戰略重心轉向封鎖荷莫茲海峽及威脅海灣國家，作為主要施壓手段。胡塞武裝同時擾亂曼德海峽的能力，更加劇了全球航運所面臨的威脅。伊朗將優先重建飛彈與無人機能力，而非核基礎設施，以維持封鎖海峽選項的可信度。對決策者而言，這意味著波斯灣在2026年2月前的安全架構已然過時：海灣合作委員會成員國面臨持續性的脅迫威脅，能源供應鏈多元化已刻不容緩，未來任何外交框架都必須將伊朗已展現的將海上咽喉要道武器化的意願納入考量。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Western Pacific remains a highly active theater defined by sustained U.S.-led military exercises and escalating great power competition. Key evidence includes continuous joint operations, such as RIMPAC 2026 in Hawaii and the deployment of CSGs into the South China Sea, juxtaposed with increased naval activity from both China (PLAN task groups) and Russia near Japan's critical straits. These movements underscore a strategic push by non-allied powers to assert presence and challenge regional norms. Policy implications dictate that allied nations must maintain robust multilateral cooperation and interoperability to safeguard freedom of navigation and manage escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific.
-
3.
The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
-
4.
The article argues that current market borrowing costs are rising independently of the Federal Reserve's policy stance, challenging the assumption that the Fed controls all rates. Evidence shows significant increases in key rates—such as 2-year Treasuries and mortgages—even while the effective federal funds rate remains steady. This divergence occurs because market rates reflect complex factors like inflation expectations, credit risk, and geopolitical volatility, which are outside the central bank's direct control. Policymakers should therefore recognize that sustainable rate moderation requires credible disinflation and disciplined government budgets, rather than relying solely on Fed intervention.
-
5.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.