Why a ‘whole-of-society’ model is essential for Ukraine’s recovery

Chatham House | 2026-06-26 | society

ThinkTankWeekly provides a curated entry and summary only. Full text and PDF remain on the publisher's website.

English Summary

The Chatham House article argues that Ukraine's post-war recovery necessitates adopting a 'whole-of-society' model, mirroring the nation’s wartime resilience. Key evidence shows that successful recovery cannot rely solely on state authorities but requires effective collaboration among local governments, civil society organizations (CSOs), the private sector, and international donors. The paper emphasizes that this inclusive approach is crucial for ensuring that reconstruction processes are comprehensive and sustainable. Policy-wise, this implies a strategic shift toward fostering deep public-private partnerships and institutionalizing collaborative mechanisms to maximize resource mobilization.

中文摘要

這篇來自 Chatham House 的文章論點指出，烏克蘭戰後復甦需要採納「全社會動員」模式，以呼應其在戰時展現的韌性。關鍵證據顯示，成功的重建不能僅依賴國家權威機構，更需地方政府、公民社會組織（CSOs）、私營部門以及國際捐助者之間進行有效的協作。該論文強調，這種包容性的方法對於確保重建過程的全面性和可持續性至關重要。從政策層面來看，這意味著必須戰略轉向，培育深度的公私夥伴關係，並制度化協作機制，以最大化資源動員。

Related Entries

1.

U.S. Navy Orders Low-cost Missiles to Expand Fleet, Allied Long-Range Maritime Strike Capabilities (USNI)

2026-07-24 | china_indopacific | 2026-W30 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Taiwan, Ukraine, United States

The U.S. Navy is prioritizing the procurement of low-cost, long-range cruise missiles through programs like CHAOS and CAMS to significantly expand strike capabilities for both its own fleet and allied partners. This strategic shift provides affordable precision munitions capable of striking targets up to 1,000 nautical miles, addressing critical stockpiles depleted by recent conflicts. By developing these systems, the U.S. aims to overcome procurement delays faced by allies (such as Japan and Taiwan) who rely on older missile designs. Ultimately, this initiative strengthens allied deterrence and bolsters long-range maritime strike capabilities necessary for potential conflict with China.

Read at USNI
2.

Hormuz Transits Remain Low, Houthis Resume Attacks in Red Sea (USNI)

2026-07-24 | middle_east | 2026-W30 | Topics: China, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

Escalating tensions between Iran and the U.S., coupled with renewed Houthi blockades in the Red Sea, have severely disrupted critical shipping chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz. Key evidence includes sharply reduced transit numbers and repeated attacks by Iranian-linked vessels off Oman's coast, while the Houthis enforce a maritime embargo on Saudi-linked ships. Strategically, this instability threatens global energy markets, forcing major powers to weigh their import needs. The continued volatility suggests that both Iran and the U.S. are willing to absorb significant economic pain to gain geopolitical leverage over regional stability.

Read at USNI
3.

The Small Suffer What They Must? (Foreign Affairs)

2026-07-23 | china_indopacific | 2026-W30 | Topics: China, Climate, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

The article argues that smaller states are becoming disproportionate victims of a collapsing global order, as great powers increasingly erode international law through unilateral actions, tariffs, and geopolitical coercion. Key evidence includes the neutering of institutions like the WTO and the withdrawal of global public goods (e.g., development aid), leaving small nations vulnerable to economic barriers and instability. For policy, the text stresses that while smaller states must collaborate to reinforce international norms and strengthen their collective voice, great powers must commit to reforming existing institutions rather than undermining them for short-term strategic gains.

Read at Foreign Affairs
4.

The Iran Cease-Fire Was Doomed to Fail (Foreign Affairs)

2026-07-22 | middle_east | 2026-W30 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

The article argues that standalone, transactional diplomatic bargains—such as the recent US-Iran cease-fire—are inherently doomed to fail because they postpone resolution rather than addressing the root causes of conflict. The failure stems from a global shift away from structured multilateralism toward narrow, opportunistic deals, which allows warring parties to merely pause fighting while preparing for the next escalation. This trend increases regional instability by leaving fundamental disputes unresolved (e.g., the core security dilemma between Iran and the West). Policymakers must therefore recognize that relying on personal access or quick fixes is insufficient; sustained conflict resolution requires robust institutional frameworks and comprehensive political compromise.

Read at Foreign Affairs
5.

When China Gets Its Own Mythos (Foreign Affairs)

2026-07-22 | defense | 2026-W30 | Topics: China, Cybersecurity, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

Advanced AI models are fundamentally transforming cyber warfare, enabling adversaries to find and exploit critical infrastructure vulnerabilities at an unprecedented scale. While U.S. defenders currently hold a lead, China is rapidly closing this gap by acquiring capabilities through illicit means like adversarial distillation and chip smuggling, ensuring any developed offensive tech goes directly to the state apparatus. This poses an immediate threat of widespread physical compromise across essential systems (power, water) that current infrastructure cannot withstand. Policymakers must recognize the extremely short window remaining to implement dramatic, preemptive policy shifts in cyber defense and harden structurally weak critical infrastructure before adversaries achieve parity.

Read at Foreign Affairs