The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
Don’t Partition Sudan Again
English Summary
Sudan is rapidly descending into a de facto partition, characterized by rival military and political control rather than a unified state. The Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) has consolidated power in the north and center, while the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) dominate Darfur and Kordofan, each establishing rival governments and diverging economies. This fragmentation risks turning the civil conflict into a permanent, multi-sided struggle for regional dominance. Policymakers must therefore prioritize diplomatic efforts aimed at preventing further fragmentation and supporting a national reconciliation framework, rather than engaging with the warring factions' claims.
中文摘要
蘇丹正迅速走向實質分裂，其特徵是敵對的軍事和政治控制，而非統一的國家體系。蘇丹武裝部隊（SAF）在北部和中部鞏固了權力，而快速支援部隊（RSF）則主導達爾富爾和科爾多法南，兩方各自建立對抗性的政府和分歧的經濟體系。這種碎片化風險可能將內戰轉變為一場永久性的、多方爭奪區域主導權的鬥爭。因此，政策制定者必須將外交努力的重點放在預防進一步的碎片化，並支持國家和解框架，而非介入與交戰派系提出的主張。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.
-
3.
The analysis highlights that despite temporary ceasefires, the prospect of a durable resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains highly remote due to political fragmentation and continued instability in Gaza and the West Bank. Key reasoning emphasizes that achieving statehood requires practical steps, including rebuilding effective governance structures and fostering Palestinian unity, rather than relying solely on external diplomatic intervention. For policy makers, this suggests that immediate strategic focus must shift toward stabilizing local conditions and supporting viable governance models in Gaza to build a foundation for future political progress.
-
4.
The article argues that smaller states are becoming disproportionate victims of a collapsing global order, as great powers increasingly erode international law through unilateral actions, tariffs, and geopolitical coercion. Key evidence includes the neutering of institutions like the WTO and the withdrawal of global public goods (e.g., development aid), leaving small nations vulnerable to economic barriers and instability. For policy, the text stresses that while smaller states must collaborate to reinforce international norms and strengthen their collective voice, great powers must commit to reforming existing institutions rather than undermining them for short-term strategic gains.
-
5.
The analysis argues that China's strategic challenge has shifted from a systemic rivalry to one of internal economic decay, driven by the collapse of domestic demand following the property sector bubble burst. This weakness forces Beijing to rely heavily on exports for growth, which depresses global prices and weakens its overall economic standing relative to the U.S. Policymakers should view this as a definitive opportunity: aggressively investing in Western industrial resilience and implementing credible trade defenses will further erode China's strategic position. By doing so, the West can mitigate future security threats while deterring Beijing’s ability to weaponize supply chain vulnerabilities.