The White House (via OMB) strongly protests Congressional efforts within the FY 2027 NDAA to prohibit the purchase of warships from foreign shipyards. The Administration argues that these restrictions undermine national security by limiting flexibility and hindering its strategy of leveraging allied yards, such as in the 'Finland model,' to drive investment into U.S. shipbuilding capacity. This signals a significant policy shift toward integrating international partners into advanced naval construction, suggesting the Pentagon is prepared to bypass traditional domestic build requirements for future combat vessels.
Are America’s Allies Finally Learning to Deal With Trump?
English Summary
A recent Foreign Affairs podcast highlights that U.S. allies are belatedly recognizing the fundamental shift in the U.S.-alliance dynamic under President Trump’s second term. The core argument is that allies initially failed to develop alternative strategies, evidenced by events like threats to abandon NATO, limited support for Japan against China, and a lack of consultation regarding the Iran conflict. Since then, however, European allies, particularly after Mark Carney’s Davos speech and the Greenland incident, have begun to acknowledge the diminished reliance on U.S. support and are starting to formulate more independent approaches. This shift reflects a growing understanding that the traditional U.S.-led order is no longer guaranteed, necessitating a re-evaluation of strategic partnerships.
中文摘要
最近《外交事務》播客指出，在川普總統第二任期間，美國盟友才開始意識到美國與盟國關係動態的根本性轉變。核心論點是，盟友最初未能制定替代策略，例如對北約的放棄威脅、對日本的反對中國有限的支持以及就伊朗衝突缺乏諮詢。然而，自那時以來，歐洲盟友，尤其是在馬克·卡尼在達沃斯發布的演講和格陵蘭事件之後，開始承認對美國支持的依賴程度降低，並開始構思更獨立的方法。這種轉變反映了越來越深刻的認識，即傳統以美國為中心的秩序不再有保障，這需要重新評估戰略夥伴關係。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Western Pacific remains a highly active theater defined by sustained U.S.-led military exercises and escalating great power competition. Key evidence includes continuous joint operations, such as RIMPAC 2026 in Hawaii and the deployment of CSGs into the South China Sea, juxtaposed with increased naval activity from both China (PLAN task groups) and Russia near Japan's critical straits. These movements underscore a strategic push by non-allied powers to assert presence and challenge regional norms. Policy implications dictate that allied nations must maintain robust multilateral cooperation and interoperability to safeguard freedom of navigation and manage escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific.
-
3.
The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
-
4.
The article argues that current market borrowing costs are rising independently of the Federal Reserve's policy stance, challenging the assumption that the Fed controls all rates. Evidence shows significant increases in key rates—such as 2-year Treasuries and mortgages—even while the effective federal funds rate remains steady. This divergence occurs because market rates reflect complex factors like inflation expectations, credit risk, and geopolitical volatility, which are outside the central bank's direct control. Policymakers should therefore recognize that sustainable rate moderation requires credible disinflation and disciplined government budgets, rather than relying solely on Fed intervention.
-
5.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.