This analysis summarizes Orville Schell's observations of the Trump-Xi summit, arguing that the interactions between the two leaders are critical indicators of the future stability of U.S.-China relations. Schell's key reasoning focuses not only on what was discussed but also on the sensitive issues that were deliberately avoided or downplayed during the meeting. The overall finding suggests that the summit may represent a potential inflection point, signaling a possible shift in the strategic relationship between the two global powers. Policymakers must monitor these subtle dynamics to anticipate whether the relationship is moving toward de-escalation or renewed strategic tension.
Liberalism in Time: A History
English Summary
The analysis argues that liberalism is not a fixed doctrine but a resilient political tradition whose core values—such as individual rights and the rule of law—have consistently adapted to prevailing historical conditions. Evidence from history, spanning from Locke's Biblical frameworks to the 19th-century influence of Darwinian theory, demonstrates that liberal thought shifts its assumptions about progress and society to survive. For policy, this implies that any strategy relying on a single, static definition of 'liberal' principles will fail; instead, effective governance requires recognizing and adapting to the unique historical, social, and technological forces shaping the current political environment.
中文摘要
本分析認為，自由主義並非一個固定的學說，而是一種具備韌性的政治傳統。其核心價值，例如個人權利和法治，始終適應著當前的歷史條件。歷史證據顯示，從洛克（Locke）的聖經框架到19世紀達爾文理論的影響，自由思想不斷調整其關於進步與社會的假設，以求生存。因此，在政策層面，這意味著任何依賴單一、靜態定義的「自由」原則的策略都將會失敗；相反地，有效的治理必須承認並適應塑造當前政治環境的獨特歷史、社會和技術力量。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that the concept of great power spheres of influence has evolved beyond traditional military boundaries, now manifesting in functional domains like critical technology and digital infrastructure. This shift allows powerful states, such as China, to consolidate an 'open sphere' by leveraging economic and technological influence, particularly if the United States makes unilateral concessions or is strategically distracted. The author warns that the U.S.'s willingness to make policy concessions regarding Taiwan and its diminishing reliability as a security guarantor could hasten China's consolidation of influence in the Indo-Pacific. Strategically, this necessitates that Washington update its understanding of modern spheres to prevent a major geopolitical division that could escalate into conflict.
-
3.
Following a period of appeasement to the US under a volatile administration, European nations have undergone a strategic pivot toward self-reliance and collective action. This shift was catalyzed by perceived US overreach, prompting Europe to coordinate joint military exercises, activate anti-coercion tools, and establish a collective defense financing program. Economically, the EU is rapidly constructing a parallel trading system through major bilateral deals (e.g., India, Australia), reducing dependence on traditional transatlantic markets. These developments signal that Europe is building a more resilient, sovereign security and economic core, materially altering its geopolitical trajectory toward strategic autonomy.
-
4.
The article argues that corporate America's current silence regarding systemic threats—such as the erosion of the rule of law or the independence of federal institutions—poses a significant risk to democratic capitalism. This quietude contrasts sharply with past corporate activism, as business leaders fear political backlash rather than confronting fundamental institutional assaults. The core finding is that the rule of law and independent agencies (like the Federal Reserve) are the 'sine qua non' of stable economic activity, making their integrity paramount to market function. Policy implication suggests that corporate leaders must coordinate efforts to identify and defend these systemic 'redlines,' ensuring that the foundational laws and norms necessary for commerce remain protected.
-
5.
Despite the public appearance of stabilization, the summit failed to resolve fundamental structural disputes between the U.S. and China, suggesting the competition remains deeply entrenched. Key issues, particularly Taiwan, trade imbalances, and geopolitical rivalry, were merely 'kicked down the road' through diplomatic rhetoric of 'strategic stability.' The analysis suggests that China is unlikely to make major concessions, viewing them as signs of weakness, meaning the relationship will continue to be managed through guarded competition rather than genuine cooperation. Policymakers must therefore anticipate persistent friction points and maintain vigilance regarding unresolved flashpoints to navigate the ongoing great power rivalry.