ThinkTankWeekly

The Jokowi Presidency: Indonesia’s Decade of Authoritarian Revival

Foreign Affairs | 2026-04-21 | china_indopacific

Visit original source

ThinkTankWeekly provides a curated entry and summary only. Full text and PDF remain on the publisher's website.

English Summary

The analysis concludes that Jokowi's presidency delivered significant economic gains, marked by infrastructural transformation and low inflation, but at a steep democratic cost. While the administration successfully disrupted old political networks, it replaced them with new forms of cronyism and systematically weakened anti-corruption mechanisms. Crucially, the government also curtailed dissent and blocked political rivals, demonstrating a clear trend toward authoritarian consolidation. This pattern suggests that rapid state development and economic growth in developing nations may not inherently preserve democratic institutions, posing a structural risk of democratic backsliding.

中文摘要

分析總結指出,喬科維(Jokowi)的總統任期雖然帶來了顯著的經濟增長,體現為基礎設施的轉型和低通膨,但其代價卻是高昂的民主成本。儘管政府成功瓦解了舊有的政治網絡,但卻以新的裙帶關係形式取而代之,並系統性地削弱了反腐機制。更關鍵的是,政府也限制了異議聲音並阻撓政治競爭對手,展現出明顯的威權鞏固趨勢。此一模式暗示,發展中國家若追求快速的國家發展和經濟增長,並不能必然地維護民主制度,這構成了一種結構性的民主倒退風險。

Related Entries

  1. 1.
    2026-07-24 | middle_east | 2026-W30 | Topics: AI, China, Europe, Middle East, NATO, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  2. 2.
    2026-07-24 | china_indopacific | 2026-W30 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  3. 3.
    2026-07-23 | middle_east | 2026-W30 | Topics: Middle East

    The analysis highlights that despite temporary ceasefires, the prospect of a durable resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains highly remote due to political fragmentation and continued instability in Gaza and the West Bank. Key reasoning emphasizes that achieving statehood requires practical steps, including rebuilding effective governance structures and fostering Palestinian unity, rather than relying solely on external diplomatic intervention. For policy makers, this suggests that immediate strategic focus must shift toward stabilizing local conditions and supporting viable governance models in Gaza to build a foundation for future political progress.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  4. 4.
    2026-07-23 | china_indopacific | 2026-W30 | Topics: China, Climate, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that smaller states are becoming disproportionate victims of a collapsing global order, as great powers increasingly erode international law through unilateral actions, tariffs, and geopolitical coercion. Key evidence includes the neutering of institutions like the WTO and the withdrawal of global public goods (e.g., development aid), leaving small nations vulnerable to economic barriers and instability. For policy, the text stresses that while smaller states must collaborate to reinforce international norms and strengthen their collective voice, great powers must commit to reforming existing institutions rather than undermining them for short-term strategic gains.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  5. 5.
    2026-07-23 | economy | 2026-W30 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Trade, United States

    The analysis argues that China's strategic challenge has shifted from a systemic rivalry to one of internal economic decay, driven by the collapse of domestic demand following the property sector bubble burst. This weakness forces Beijing to rely heavily on exports for growth, which depresses global prices and weakens its overall economic standing relative to the U.S. Policymakers should view this as a definitive opportunity: aggressively investing in Western industrial resilience and implementing credible trade defenses will further erode China's strategic position. By doing so, the West can mitigate future security threats while deterring Beijing’s ability to weaponize supply chain vulnerabilities.

    Read at Foreign Affairs