The article argues that modern conflicts are increasingly defined by attrition, driven by three strategic gaps: the difference between nominal military power and usable capacity; the difficulty of achieving breakthroughs in a technologically advanced battlefield; and the detachment of military means from clear political objectives. Evidence from Ukraine and the Middle East demonstrates that sustained logistics, rapid technological adaptation, and proxy networks are now more decisive than sheer military size. For policymakers, this implies a strategic shift away from seeking short, decisive victories toward preparing for prolonged, high-cost engagements, requiring a focus on sustainable supply chains and defining concrete, attainable political end-states.
Will the UK’s Defence Investment Plan finally be honest about Britain’s defence?
English Summary
The UK's Defence Investment Plan must finally break with endemic dishonesty in defence policy that has systematically misaligned strategic ambitions with actual resources. Decades of promises to achieve 'more with less' through efficiency savings and technological fixes have failed, as evidenced by the UK's inability to mount a rapid maritime response during the 2026 Gulf crisis. The DIP must confront hard tradeoffs between expensive domestic procurement and open-market solutions, and make explicit choices between homeland/Arctic defence or global force projection—a choice obscured by strategic ambiguity for decades. Without such honesty about costs and capabilities, the plan risks repeating past failures and further undermining credibility with NATO allies. The critical test will be whether the DIP finally aligns realistic resources with achievable strategic goals rather than continuing rhetorical ambitions unsupported by budgets.
中文摘要
英國的《國防投資計畫》（DIP）必須擺脫國防政策中根深蒂固的不誠實，因為過去的政策系統性地將戰略抱負與實際資源脫節。數十年來，透過效率節約和技術修補來實現「用更少的資源達到更多」的承諾已然失敗，英國在2026年海灣危機期間無法發動快速海事應對，便是明證。DIP必須直面昂貴的國內採購與開放市場解決方案之間的艱難取捨，並明確選擇是專注於本土/北極防禦，還是進行全球武力投射——這是數十年來因戰略模糊性而掩蓋的選擇。若不對成本和能力做出如此坦誠的評估，該計畫就有重蹈過往失敗的風險，並進一步削弱與北約盟友的信譽。關鍵的考驗在於，DIP是否能真正將現實資源與可實現的戰略目標對齊，而非繼續提出缺乏預算支持的修辭性抱負。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
Congress has significantly expanded presidential tariff authority by passing the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026, allowing the executive to impose up to 100% tariffs on key buyers of Russian energy and sanctions enablers. The article argues that this legislation represents a dangerous abdication of Congress's Article I authority, as it grants the executive vast, discretionary power without specifying criteria for enforcement. Historically, the executive could claim tariffs were its own doing; however, by writing and passing this new authority, Congress now owns the resulting trade policy and its economic consequences. This shift implies that future tariffs will be viewed by the public as a direct legislative action, potentially undermining the administration's credibility and creating political vulnerability.
-
3.
Cuba is on a trajectory toward an accelerating state and economic collapse, risking a point of no return. The state is deteriorating into "authoritarian anarchy," retaining its capacity for political repression but losing the ability to provide basic public services like health and safety. Economically, while the private sector is growing, this expansion is highly unequal, fueling cronyism and widening class gaps between the elite and the poor. If the current trend continues, the country risks calcifying these defects into a dysfunctional baseline, severely diminishing the chances of a stable, democratic transition.
-
4.
The article analyzes Finland's agreement to coordinate its conventional forces with French nuclear capabilities, clarifying that no nuclear weapons will be stationed in Finland. The author argues that increased communication between nuclear powers, rather than the deployment of weapons, is beneficial for reducing the risk of miscalculation and inadvertent escalation, particularly near Russia. For Europe, the policy recommendation is a responsible middle course: strengthening non-nuclear military capabilities to deter Russia while simultaneously negotiating a stable system, such as non-aligned buffer states. This approach is presented as a diplomatic alternative to both aggressive military action and surrender.
-
5.
The article argues that China's ongoing purges are not signs of weakness, but rather a sophisticated, historically rooted process of 'rectification' that strengthens the CCP's grip on power. This mechanism requires cadres to submit mandatory self-criticisms and build permanent, detailed personnel files (dossiers). This system of record-keeping is the CCP's primary source of resilience, creating profound, internalized discipline that controls internal dissent. Policymakers must recognize that the regime's durability stems from this deep internal control mechanism, making succession—rather than internal purges—the ultimate strategic vulnerability.