The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
As Iran war reshapes the Middle East, Turkey’s regional role looks set to expand
English Summary
As the Iran war reshapes the Middle East, Turkey is poised to expand its regional influence, driven by concerns over Iran’s attempts to redefine regional security dynamics, particularly regarding the Strait of Hormuz. Evidence suggests Turkey fears a prolonged conflict and regional instability, leading to increased security partnerships and defense industry cooperation with Gulf states – a move partially motivated by a desire to diversify away from US security guarantees. Furthermore, the conflict is fueling opportunities for Turkey to expand its role in regional connectivity projects, such as trade corridor redesigns and transport networks, exemplified by initiatives like the Iraq Development Road and the Middle Corridor. This expansion is also underscored by the formation of new regional alignments, like the Turkey-Pakistan-Saudi Arabia-Egypt quartet, aimed at shaping post-war geopolitics.
中文摘要
随着伊朗战争重塑中东，土耳其正有机会扩大其地区影响力，这主要源于土耳其对伊朗试图重新定义地区安全格局，特别是就霍尔木兹海峡的争端所抱有的担忧。证据表明，土耳其担心冲突将持续不断，并导致地区不稳定，从而促成了与海湾国家加强安全伙伴关系和国防工业合作，这部分也受到其希望摆脱美国安全保障的动机驱动。此外，这场冲突也为土耳其在地区互联互通项目中的作用提供了机会，例如贸易走廊的重新设计和交通网络，如伊拉克发展公路和中线项目。这种扩张也体现在新的地区联盟的形成上，例如土耳其、巴基斯坦、沙特阿拉伯和埃及的四方合作，旨在塑造战后地缘政治格局。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that current market borrowing costs are rising independently of the Federal Reserve's policy stance, challenging the assumption that the Fed controls all rates. Evidence shows significant increases in key rates—such as 2-year Treasuries and mortgages—even while the effective federal funds rate remains steady. This divergence occurs because market rates reflect complex factors like inflation expectations, credit risk, and geopolitical volatility, which are outside the central bank's direct control. Policymakers should therefore recognize that sustainable rate moderation requires credible disinflation and disciplined government budgets, rather than relying solely on Fed intervention.
-
3.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.
-
4.U.S. Navy Orders Low-cost Missiles to Expand Fleet, Allied Long-Range Maritime Strike Capabilities (USNI)
The U.S. Navy is prioritizing the procurement of low-cost, long-range cruise missiles through programs like CHAOS and CAMS to significantly expand strike capabilities for both its own fleet and allied partners. This strategic shift provides affordable precision munitions capable of striking targets up to 1,000 nautical miles, addressing critical stockpiles depleted by recent conflicts. By developing these systems, the U.S. aims to overcome procurement delays faced by allies (such as Japan and Taiwan) who rely on older missile designs. Ultimately, this initiative strengthens allied deterrence and bolsters long-range maritime strike capabilities necessary for potential conflict with China.
-
5.
Escalating tensions between Iran and the U.S., coupled with renewed Houthi blockades in the Red Sea, have severely disrupted critical shipping chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz. Key evidence includes sharply reduced transit numbers and repeated attacks by Iranian-linked vessels off Oman's coast, while the Houthis enforce a maritime embargo on Saudi-linked ships. Strategically, this instability threatens global energy markets, forcing major powers to weigh their import needs. The continued volatility suggests that both Iran and the U.S. are willing to absorb significant economic pain to gain geopolitical leverage over regional stability.