The White House (via OMB) strongly protests Congressional efforts within the FY 2027 NDAA to prohibit the purchase of warships from foreign shipyards. The Administration argues that these restrictions undermine national security by limiting flexibility and hindering its strategy of leveraging allied yards, such as in the 'Finland model,' to drive investment into U.S. shipbuilding capacity. This signals a significant policy shift toward integrating international partners into advanced naval construction, suggesting the Pentagon is prepared to bypass traditional domestic build requirements for future combat vessels.
The FCAS fighter jet looks like it’s dead. Could that be a good thing?
English Summary
The FCAS fighter jet program is effectively collapsing as Germany seeks to withdraw, primarily due to France and Germany's incompatible requirements—France needs carrier and nuclear capabilities while Germany seeks a conventional fighter. This failure reflects broader European defense fragmentation, with four competing next-generation fighter programs underway, which threatens to splinter resources and leave Europe dangerously dependent on an unreliable US F-35 supply through the 2040s. However, this impasse could prove beneficial if it prompts European states to abandon the outdated procurement model driven by industrial prestige and export competition, instead consolidating resources into a single, unified fighter system focused on urgent strategic needs.
中文摘要
FCAS戰鬥機計畫正實質崩潰，主要原因是法國和德國之間需求的不相容——法國要求搭載航空母艦和核武能力，而德國則只尋求一款傳統戰鬥機。此失敗反映了歐洲更廣泛的防衛碎片化現象，目前有四個競爭的下一代戰鬥機計畫正在進行，這威脅到分散資源，並可能使歐洲在2040年代持續依賴不可靠的美國F-35供應。然而，這種僵局若能促使歐洲國家放棄受產業聲望和出口競爭驅動的過時採購模式，轉而將資源集中於一個單一、統一的戰鬥機系統，專注於迫切的戰略需求，則可能帶來益處。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Western Pacific remains a highly active theater defined by sustained U.S.-led military exercises and escalating great power competition. Key evidence includes continuous joint operations, such as RIMPAC 2026 in Hawaii and the deployment of CSGs into the South China Sea, juxtaposed with increased naval activity from both China (PLAN task groups) and Russia near Japan's critical straits. These movements underscore a strategic push by non-allied powers to assert presence and challenge regional norms. Policy implications dictate that allied nations must maintain robust multilateral cooperation and interoperability to safeguard freedom of navigation and manage escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific.
-
3.
The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
-
4.
The article argues that current market borrowing costs are rising independently of the Federal Reserve's policy stance, challenging the assumption that the Fed controls all rates. Evidence shows significant increases in key rates—such as 2-year Treasuries and mortgages—even while the effective federal funds rate remains steady. This divergence occurs because market rates reflect complex factors like inflation expectations, credit risk, and geopolitical volatility, which are outside the central bank's direct control. Policymakers should therefore recognize that sustainable rate moderation requires credible disinflation and disciplined government budgets, rather than relying solely on Fed intervention.
-
5.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.