The ongoing Ebola outbreak in the DRC serves as a critical warning that the global health security system is fundamentally unprepared for future biological threats. The difficulty in containing this outbreak is compounded by the rising risk of emerging pathogens and the growing potential for AI misuse in bioweapon development. Policy must therefore shift from reactive, crisis-driven funding to sustained, proactive investment in resilient public health infrastructure, particularly in conflict zones. Addressing this requires strengthening global surveillance, ensuring consistent international cooperation, and mitigating the intersection of conflict, climate change, and disease spread.
The End of the Open Internet
English Summary
The article argues that the era of the open, unregulated internet is ending as liberal democracies — led by Europe — shift from promoting internet freedom as a geopolitical ideal to asserting digital sovereignty and applying offline legal standards to online spaces. This reversal is traced from the optimism of the Arab Spring, when social media was seen as inherently liberalizing, to the current consensus that platforms require regulation to counter disinformation, hate speech, and foreign interference. The implication is a fragmenting global internet governance landscape, where even democracies now pursue regulatory frameworks that constrain platform behavior, potentially narrowing the ideological gap with authoritarian models of internet control and complicating transatlantic tech policy coordination.
中文摘要
本文主張開放、不受管制的網際網路時代正在終結，以歐洲為首的自由民主國家正從將網路自由視為地緣政治理想，轉向主張數位主權並將線下法律標準適用於網路空間。這一轉變可追溯自阿拉伯之春時期的樂觀氛圍——當時社群媒體被視為天然具有自由化效果——到當前各方已形成共識，認為平台需要監管以應對假訊息、仇恨言論及外國干預。其意涵在於全球網路治理格局日趨碎片化，即便是民主國家現在也在推行約束平台行為的監管框架，這可能縮小與威權網路管控模式之間的意識形態差距，並使跨大西洋科技政策協調更加複雜。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that modern conflicts are increasingly defined by attrition, driven by three strategic gaps: the difference between nominal military power and usable capacity; the difficulty of achieving breakthroughs in a technologically advanced battlefield; and the detachment of military means from clear political objectives. Evidence from Ukraine and the Middle East demonstrates that sustained logistics, rapid technological adaptation, and proxy networks are now more decisive than sheer military size. For policymakers, this implies a strategic shift away from seeking short, decisive victories toward preparing for prolonged, high-cost engagements, requiring a focus on sustainable supply chains and defining concrete, attainable political end-states.
-
3.
Cuba is on a trajectory toward an accelerating state and economic collapse, risking a point of no return. The state is deteriorating into "authoritarian anarchy," retaining its capacity for political repression but losing the ability to provide basic public services like health and safety. Economically, while the private sector is growing, this expansion is highly unequal, fueling cronyism and widening class gaps between the elite and the poor. If the current trend continues, the country risks calcifying these defects into a dysfunctional baseline, severely diminishing the chances of a stable, democratic transition.
-
4.
The article analyzes Finland's agreement to coordinate its conventional forces with French nuclear capabilities, clarifying that no nuclear weapons will be stationed in Finland. The author argues that increased communication between nuclear powers, rather than the deployment of weapons, is beneficial for reducing the risk of miscalculation and inadvertent escalation, particularly near Russia. For Europe, the policy recommendation is a responsible middle course: strengthening non-nuclear military capabilities to deter Russia while simultaneously negotiating a stable system, such as non-aligned buffer states. This approach is presented as a diplomatic alternative to both aggressive military action and surrender.
-
5.
The article argues that China's ongoing purges are not signs of weakness, but rather a sophisticated, historically rooted process of 'rectification' that strengthens the CCP's grip on power. This mechanism requires cadres to submit mandatory self-criticisms and build permanent, detailed personnel files (dossiers). This system of record-keeping is the CCP's primary source of resilience, creating profound, internalized discipline that controls internal dissent. Policymakers must recognize that the regime's durability stems from this deep internal control mechanism, making succession—rather than internal purges—the ultimate strategic vulnerability.