The White House (via OMB) strongly protests Congressional efforts within the FY 2027 NDAA to prohibit the purchase of warships from foreign shipyards. The Administration argues that these restrictions undermine national security by limiting flexibility and hindering its strategy of leveraging allied yards, such as in the 'Finland model,' to drive investment into U.S. shipbuilding capacity. This signals a significant policy shift toward integrating international partners into advanced naval construction, suggesting the Pentagon is prepared to bypass traditional domestic build requirements for future combat vessels.
Europe Cannot Be a Military Power
English Summary
The article argues that Europe cannot achieve true military power due to its historical reliance on the United States for security, a structure that has allowed it to prioritize economic integration. This traditional division of labor is now destabilized by unpredictable external pressures, exemplified by the actions of figures like Donald Trump, which undermine NATO cohesion and European sovereignty. Consequently, Europe faces a critical strategic challenge: it must redefine its security posture and pursue greater strategic autonomy without attempting to achieve full military parity with global powers. Policy efforts must therefore focus on strengthening internal resilience and diplomatic coordination rather than solely on military buildup.
中文摘要
本文論述，由於歐洲歷史上過度依賴美國的安全保障，導致其難以實現真正的軍事強權，這種結構使其能將重點放在經濟整合上。然而，這種傳統的職能分工現正受到不可預測的外部壓力所動搖，例如以唐納德·川普等人物的行為為例，這些行為削弱了北約的凝聚力與歐洲主權。因此，歐洲面臨一個關鍵的戰略挑戰：它必須重新定義其安全態勢，並追求更高的戰略自主性，但同時不能試圖與全球大國達成完全的軍事均勢。政策努力因此必須著重於強化內部韌性與外交協調，而非單純地進行軍備擴張。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Western Pacific remains a highly active theater defined by sustained U.S.-led military exercises and escalating great power competition. Key evidence includes continuous joint operations, such as RIMPAC 2026 in Hawaii and the deployment of CSGs into the South China Sea, juxtaposed with increased naval activity from both China (PLAN task groups) and Russia near Japan's critical straits. These movements underscore a strategic push by non-allied powers to assert presence and challenge regional norms. Policy implications dictate that allied nations must maintain robust multilateral cooperation and interoperability to safeguard freedom of navigation and manage escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific.
-
3.
The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
-
4.
The article argues that current market borrowing costs are rising independently of the Federal Reserve's policy stance, challenging the assumption that the Fed controls all rates. Evidence shows significant increases in key rates—such as 2-year Treasuries and mortgages—even while the effective federal funds rate remains steady. This divergence occurs because market rates reflect complex factors like inflation expectations, credit risk, and geopolitical volatility, which are outside the central bank's direct control. Policymakers should therefore recognize that sustainable rate moderation requires credible disinflation and disciplined government budgets, rather than relying solely on Fed intervention.
-
5.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.