ThinkTankWeekly

The Coming Crisis In Russias Political Economy

IISS | 2026-05-24 | economy

Topics: Russia, Ukraine

Visit original source

ThinkTankWeekly provides a curated entry and summary only. Full text and PDF remain on the publisher's website.

English Summary

The paper argues that Russia's war on Ukraine is economically unsustainable, forcing the Kremlin to choose between radical escalation or scaling back its war aims. Key evidence points to severe resource constraints, labor shortages, and the high cost of modern military production, which is straining state finances and depressing civilian sectors. To sustain the conflict, Russia must resort to highly disruptive, command-like measures that curtail market freedoms and civil liberties. These necessary internal controls carry major risks for regime stability, suggesting that the Kremlin will intensify its grip on both the population and the elite.

中文摘要

本文論述俄羅斯對烏克蘭的戰爭在經濟上難以持續,迫使克里姆林宮必須在激進升級或縮減戰爭目標之間做出選擇。關鍵證據指出,嚴重的資源限制、勞動力短缺以及現代軍事生產的高成本,正在拖累國家財政,並壓抑民用部門。若要維持衝突,俄羅斯必須訴諸高度干預市場、限制市場自由和公民權利的命令式措施。這些必要的內部管制對政權穩定性構成重大風險,暗示著克里姆林宮將會加強對民眾和精英階層的控制。

Related Entries

  1. 1.

    Despite significant damage to its naval fleet, shipyards, and production facilities from recent strikes, Iran is expected to quickly reconstitute its military industrial base. This reconstitution relies heavily on importing dual-use components, such as machine tools, drone parts, and marine engines, through alternative routes like Pakistan or China. To counter this threat, the report advises that policymakers must extend sanctions mechanisms—particularly 'no reexport' clauses—and proactively engage third countries with direct access to Iran. Furthermore, monitoring allied firms dealing with key suppliers in China and Turkey is crucial to slowing down and raising the cost of necessary procurements.

    Read at CSIS

  2. 2.
    2026-06-26 | europe | 2026-W26 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Ukraine, United States

    Ukraine demonstrates remarkable resilience and technological adaptability despite continuous Russian attacks on civilian infrastructure and critical services. While Kyiv's military is adapting through innovative drone warfare and strikes, its long-term stability requires sustained international support to counter Russia’s escalating threats. Strategically, the U.S. must coordinate with key European powers (E3) due to shifting political attention, while immediately deploying negotiators to Ukraine to gain ground truth and plan for potential escalation scenarios.

    Read at Brookings

  3. 3.

    Africa's economic landscape is at a critical inflection point, shifting away from traditional foreign aid toward sophisticated commercial investment and private-sector co-investment. This transition is underpinned by major regional initiatives like the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), which grants African nations significant agency and negotiating leverage. Consequently, external powers must pivot their strategy from conditional development assistance to facilitating partnerships in key sectors such as digital infrastructure, energy transition, agribusiness, and critical minerals. Failure to acknowledge Africa's growing market options risks diminishing the influence of any single global partner.

    Read at CFR

  4. 4.
    2026-06-26 | economy | 2026-W26 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine

    The Chatham House report warns of an imminent 'fifth mega-shock' to global food systems, driven by the convergence of geopolitical risks—such as disruptions in critical chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz—and resulting energy and fertilizer shortages. This vulnerability is compounded by structural weaknesses, notably the extreme concentration of staple crop reserves among a few nations, which heightens the risk of cascading inflation and widespread hunger. The analysis argues that historical shocks have failed to prompt deep systemic reforms, leaving global food security fragile and humanitarian aid strained. Policymakers must therefore urgently prioritize building resilience through supply chain diversification, avoiding nationalistic export restrictions, and coordinating international efforts to stabilize commodity markets.

    Read at Chatham House

  5. 5.
    2026-06-26 | middle_east | 2026-W26 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The analyst views the announced US-Iran deal as a fragile, temporary measure rather than a lasting settlement because it fails to address the core causes of conflict or resolve major outstanding issues like Iran's nuclear program. While reopening the Strait of Hormuz is welcome, true stability requires comprehensive negotiations that move beyond bilateral talks and incorporate regional stakeholders (e.g., China, Arab states). For the deal to endure, diplomatic efforts must adopt a multi-layered approach focused on building confidence among all parties and establishing clear structures for accountability and long-term support.

    Read at Chatham House