The article argues that modern conflicts are increasingly defined by attrition, driven by three strategic gaps: the difference between nominal military power and usable capacity; the difficulty of achieving breakthroughs in a technologically advanced battlefield; and the detachment of military means from clear political objectives. Evidence from Ukraine and the Middle East demonstrates that sustained logistics, rapid technological adaptation, and proxy networks are now more decisive than sheer military size. For policymakers, this implies a strategic shift away from seeking short, decisive victories toward preparing for prolonged, high-cost engagements, requiring a focus on sustainable supply chains and defining concrete, attainable political end-states.
Sudan’s volunteer-led aid network receives 2025 Chatham House Prize
English Summary
Sudan's volunteer-led Emergency Response Rooms (ERRs) were awarded the Chatham House Prize 2025 for their crucial humanitarian efforts amidst the ongoing conflict. This grassroots network, operating since April 2023, provides essential aid, medical support, education, and addresses gender-based violence to over thirty-three million displaced people across Sudan, often in areas inaccessible to international organizations. The recognition underscores the vital role of local initiatives in humanitarian crises, calling for sustained international support to protect civic spaces and empower Sudanese efforts for future rebuilding and transformation.
中文摘要
蘇丹志願者主導的緊急應變室 (ERRs) 因其在持續衝突中的關鍵人道主義努力而榮獲查塔姆研究所獎 2025。這個草根網絡自 2023 年 4 月開始運作，為蘇丹境內超過三百三十萬流離失所者提供基本援助、醫療支持、教育，並解決性別暴力問題，其中許多地區是國際組織難以觸及的。這項認可突顯了地方倡議在人道主義危機中的重要作用，呼籲國際社會持續支持，以保護公民空間，並賦予蘇丹人民在未來重建和轉型中更大的力量。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
Congress has significantly expanded presidential tariff authority by passing the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026, allowing the executive to impose up to 100% tariffs on key buyers of Russian energy and sanctions enablers. The article argues that this legislation represents a dangerous abdication of Congress's Article I authority, as it grants the executive vast, discretionary power without specifying criteria for enforcement. Historically, the executive could claim tariffs were its own doing; however, by writing and passing this new authority, Congress now owns the resulting trade policy and its economic consequences. This shift implies that future tariffs will be viewed by the public as a direct legislative action, potentially undermining the administration's credibility and creating political vulnerability.
-
3.
The analysis argues that contemporary warfare is marked by a return to great power competition, often fueled by strategic hubris and historical overconfidence. A key failure across modern conflicts is the 'short-war fallacy'—the assumption that overwhelming military force guarantees a quick, decisive victory. This mindset blinds policymakers to the need for sustained resource mobilization and complex political outcomes. Consequently, effective strategy requires linking military objectives with clear, comprehensive political goals, rather than pursuing rapid, decisive regime changes or military victories in isolation.
-
4.
The article argues that the planned US withdrawal of military assets from Europe, based on the premise that the continent must 'stand on its own feet,' is strategically flawed and dangerous. Key evidence includes detailed plans for slashing troops, aircraft, and command capabilities, occurring concurrently with Russia's escalation of hybrid and conventional warfare against NATO. The analysis warns that this withdrawal will leave Europe critically vulnerable and, more broadly, will undermine US global credibility, signaling to rivals that American commitments are unreliable in other theaters, including the Indo-Pacific.
-
5.
The article argues that the European Union's institutional rules, often criticized as slow and bureaucratic, are in fact its greatest strategic advantage in a volatile global environment. This stability is highlighted by contrasting the EU's rules-based, durable agreements with the unpredictable, executive-driven trade policies of major powers like the U.S. The EU's requirement for consensus and formal review ensures that its trade commitments are reliable and binding. Consequently, global partners are increasingly viewing the EU as a stable, predictable, and rules-based alternative for trade and investment, shifting away from the uncertainty created by unilateral geopolitical actions.