ThinkTankWeekly

Fascism and the Global Far Right: A Historical View

Foreign Affairs | 2026-04-21 | europe

Topics: Europe

Visit original source

ThinkTankWeekly provides a curated entry and summary only. Full text and PDF remain on the publisher's website.

English Summary

The historians argue that while contemporary global far-right movements exhibit fascist elements—such as reactionary nationalism and xenophobia—the full reemergence of consolidated, single-party fascism is unlikely. They differentiate historical fascism, which was a unique 20th-century phenomenon tied to post-WWI trauma and economic collapse, from modern movements. While the term 'fascist' is often used today as an adjective describing political techniques rather than a state structure, the persistence of these extremist methods remains a concern. Policy focus should therefore shift from anticipating a total collapse to monitoring the ideological creep and specific tactics employed by these groups.

中文摘要

歷史學家認為,儘管當代全球極右翼運動展現了法西斯元素——例如反動民族主義和排外主義——但整合的單一政黨法西斯主義完全重現的可能性不大。他們將歷史上的法西斯主義,這種與一戰後創傷和經濟崩潰相關的獨特二十世紀現象,與現代運動區分開來。雖然「法西斯」一詞如今常作為形容詞來描述政治手法,而非國家結構,但這些極端主義方法的持續存在仍是令人擔憂的。因此,政策重點應從預測全面崩潰,轉向監測這些群體的意識形態滲透和具體戰術。

Related Entries

  1. 1.
    2026-05-18 | europe | 2026-W20 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine

    The analysis suggests that Russia's ability to sustain its war effort in Ukraine is facing increasing internal and external pressures. Key evidence points to a tightening economic crisis, evidenced by widespread blackouts and a noticeable scaling back of traditional military displays. Furthermore, the discussion highlights Putin's increasing isolation and micromanagement, suggesting that the strategic initiative may be slipping out of Moscow's control. Policymakers should monitor these signs of internal strain, as they indicate potential vulnerabilities and a possible shift in Russia's military and geopolitical calculus.

    Read at Chatham House

  2. 2.
    2026-05-18 | economy | 2026-W20 | Topics: Europe, United States, Economy

    The Brookings report argues that closing long-term fiscal deficits cannot be achieved solely by taxing high earners or corporations. Analysis shows that the required savings necessitate broad-based tax increases that would significantly impact middle and lower-income families, as targeted taxes on the wealthy are insufficient. The report notes that high-tax OECD nations achieve high revenues through broad consumption taxes (like VAT) rather than exclusively through highly progressive taxes on the rich. Consequently, any major tax-funded deficit solution would impose a substantial burden on the working class, potentially without the comprehensive social benefits enjoyed by European counterparts.

    Read at Brookings

  3. 3.
    2026-05-18 | china_indopacific | 2026-W20 | Topics: AI, China, Climate, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The analysis concludes that China will hold the upper hand at the upcoming Trump-Xi summit, leveraging its dominance over critical minerals, rare earths, and magnet supply chains. This geopolitical leverage, combined with global instability (such as the Iran conflict), allows Beijing to dictate terms and buy time to consolidate its technological and industrial self-sufficiency. Strategically, the U.S. must avoid granting China a managed equilibrium by maintaining 'maximum pressure' on key sectors like AI and tech, rather than seeking broad agreements that could undermine American leadership.

    Read at CFR

  4. 4.

    The U.S.-China trade relationship remains defined by intense competition, characterized by persistent tariffs and tech export controls, despite temporary truces. While the conflict is driven by concerns over trade imbalances and China's adherence to global rules, the two economies remain deeply interdependent, making complete decoupling highly unlikely. Policy efforts are shifting away from achieving a definitive 'win' and toward managing this complex interdependence. Strategically, the U.S. must navigate the tension between protecting critical domestic industries and maintaining necessary global supply chains, suggesting a need for formalized mechanisms to manage future trade agreements.

    Read at CFR

  5. 5.

    China is consolidating its domestic energy control by restricting fuel exports to prioritize national needs, while simultaneously capitalizing on global energy instability to solidify its position as a dominant clean energy supplier. Key evidence includes record-high solar exports, driven by global supply chain shifts, and the implementation of detailed, binding national climate governance measures. These actions signal a dual strategy: enhancing energy self-sufficiency and using its manufacturing dominance to influence global energy transitions. Policymakers must anticipate that China will continue to tightly manage its energy market and leverage its climate leadership to deepen geopolitical influence.

    Read at CFR